MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388196859 · doi:10.61669/001c.17627

Welcome to the fall 2020 issue of Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning.

2020· article· en· W4388196859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicProblem and Project Based Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Air Force AcademyU.S. Air ForceUniversity of AlbertaLincoln Memorial UniversityUniversity of South DakotaUniversity of Hawai'iMcGill UniversityUniversity of OklahomaArizona State UniversityGeorgia Institute of Technology
KeywordsMentorshipPsychologySociologyLibrary scienceManagementMedical educationMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Articles in this Issue: • Issue Overview: Persevering During a Pandemic The Resilience of Assessment Professionals During Challenging Times by Giovanna Badia • A Workshop on Online Exams as a Supportive Response to Faculty’s Needs During a Pandemic by Suzanne R. Horwitz and Mary English • Anyone Else Tired of Pivoting? Unmasking Student Learning and Community Assessment Needs by Tara K. Ising and James D. Breslin • Bettering Assessment Practices through Reflection and Collaboration by Carrie R. Allen • Considerations for Meaningful Assessment During COVID-19 by Laura M. Harrison and Marc Scott • Coping with COVID 19: Lewis University College of Business Experience by George Klemic • Home Alone but Working as a Team: Virtual Collaboration for Student Learning by Kristina Ramirez Wilson, Lucy James, and Newman Chun Wai Wong • Innovative Approaches to Programmatic Assessment in an Era of Flux by Jared Androzzi and Megan Schramm-Possinger • Leading with Empathy and Learning to Flex by Eileen Soto and Jamie Smith • Let’s Connect: Maintaining and Strengthening Collaborative Relationships in a Remote Environment By Gina B. Polychronopoulos and Emilie Clucas Leaderman • Non-Academic Assessment in the Era of COVID-19: Utilizing Bolman and Deal’s Four Frames by Kadie Hayward Mullins • Nurturing Relationships Grounded in Assessment by María B. Serrano Abreau • Perseverance in Teacher Preparation and Certification Assessments During the COVID-19 Pandemic (or Not) by Rebecca Z. Grunzke • Quarantining High-Stakes Assessments in an Introductory Physics Class by Richard L Pearson III and Chad Rohrbacher • Restructuring an Assessment Leadership Institute During the 2020 Pandemic by Yao Zhang Hill, Monica Stitt-Bergh, Adrian Alarilla • Silver Linings from a Challenging Situation by Elise Demeter, Christine Robinson, Mitchel L. Cottenoir, Harriet Hobbs, and Karen E. Singer-Freeman • The Value of a Curriculum Map to Minimize Harm from Emergency Remote Instruction by Karen Singer-Freeman and Mitch Cottenoir • University-wide Assessment During Covid-19: An Opportunity for Innovation by Dena Pastor and Paula Love

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it