MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388197518 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad523

<i>Clostridium difficile</i> Enteritis With NAP7/078 Toxigenic Strain

2023· article· en· W4388197518 on OpenAlexafffund
Rahel T Zewude, Sami A. Chadi, Ève Capistran, Isaac I. Bogoch

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyDepartment of Medicine, University of TorontoUniversity of TorontoUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsClostridium difficileEnteritisMedicineMicrobiologyDiarrheaClostridium InfectionsInternal medicineAntibioticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor—We recently treated a patient with severe Clostridium difficile enteritis, and we believe that this rare syndrome would be of interest to Open Forum Infectious Diseases readers. We present our case in the context of prior literature and identify salient gaps with the role of toxigenic strains and treatment guidelines for this diagnosis with significant mortality. Our patient is a 17-year old male with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) at birth resulting in intra-abdominal adhesions managed nonoperatively. He had no other comorbidities and was not taking any medications at home. He presented with abdominal pain and vomiting, was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction (SBO), and underwent incomplete lysis of congenital or possibly post-NEC adhesions. The patient received preoperative intravenous cefazolin (2-g dose) but no other antibiotics over the preceding 3 months. Two weeks later, he was diagnosed with recurrent SBO with a distended small bowel on computed tomography. A stool C difficile toxin test returned positive (Aries polymerase chain reaction for toxin A and B detection). He was given intravenous metronidazole (500 mg every 8 hours) and enteral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 hours). He became hemodynamically unstable and underwent an urgent laparotomy, including resection of 1.5 m of ileum with intraoperative findings of pseudomembranous enteritis. He received a double-barrel stoma with ileomucocutaneous fistula via a Foley catheter. Vancomycin (500 mg every 6 hours) was administered through this catheter antegrade into the colon and retrograde into the proximal ileum, as well as antegrade through a nasogastric tube and retrograde through a rectal tube. Small intestine tissue grew C difficile on culture. Molecular genotyping returned positive for the NAP7/078 toxigenic strain (North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 7) and negative for NAP1/027. He completed a 4-week course of antibiotics and was discharged home. Following clinical and radiographic improvement, he underwent reversal of stoma 5 months later. A week after stoma reversal, he developed watery diarrhea and fever without hemodynamic instability. A stool toxin test returned positive for C difficile with genotyping redemonstrating the NAP7/078 strain. Computed tomography showed diffuse distension of small and large bowel without toxic megacolon. He received 10 days of fidaxomicin (200 mg every 12 hours) with symptom resolution. Freiler et al described 10 cases of C difficile enteritis in their 2001 publication. The article identified prior abdominal surgery as an associated comorbidity that was present in 90% of cases, as well as inflammatory bowel disease, which was present in 50% of cases [1]. However, no data regarding specific strains were reported. Klimko et al provided an updated review of C difficile enteritis in 2022, describing 77 cases over the last 20 years, also without data on toxigenic strains [2]. Interestingly, in one of the publications included in this review, Lavallée et al described the first case of C difficile enteritis caused by the NAP1/027 strain and hypothesized that NAP1/027 may be able to colonize small bowel more easily [3, 4]. They suspected that several of their 12 fatal cases of C difficile enteritis may have resulted from this toxigenic strain given its high prevalence at their hospitals with NAP1/027 nosocomial epidemics in preceding years [4, 5]. The NAP7/078 strain, in contrast, has been associated with community onset and younger patients but similar severity when compared with the NAP1/027 strain [6, 7]. There have been no prior reports of NAP7/078 C difficile enteritis. The 2021 Infectious Diseases Society of America update on C difficile management does not provide recommendations for C difficile enteritis [8]. In the reviews from Freiler et al [1] and Klimko et al [2], dual therapy with parenteral metronidazole and enteral vancomycin was used in most cases. Klimko et al also described vancomycin enemas per distal limb of conduit in several patients with stomas. Given the hemodynamic instability that persisted in our patient for a few more days beyond ileal resection and the lack of guidance around the management of severe enteritis, we administered vancomycin with 4 routes in conjunction with parenteral metronidazole. Our patient also did not have the commonly described associated comorbidities, such as prior abdominal surgery or inflammatory bowel disease. We suspect that his presentation was likely compounded by an inability to evacuate the C difficile toxin from a toxigenic strain through gastroenterocolic routes. The patient likely had a chronically obstructed state with NEC at birth with intra-abdominal adhesions that led to his SBO, which was incompletely addressed, leading to a further obstructive process. Although a rare and perhaps underdiagnosed entity, C difficile enteritis has been increasingly reported over the last 2 decades, and it carries a mortality rate of up to 30% [2, 9]. There is a knowledge gap in the role of toxigenic strains in C difficile enteritis, and genotyping in future cases can further our understanding of this. Author contributions. R. T. Z. conceptualized the study and contributed to data curation, writing of the first draft of the article, and reviewing. S. A. C. and I. I. B. contributed to data curation, writing of the first draft of the article, and reviewing. E. C. contributed to data curation and review of the article. S. A. C. and I. I. B. supervised the study as senior authors. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved its final version to be submitted for publication. All authors were involved in the patient's clinical care. Patient consent statement. The patient's verbal consent was obtained. Note that the case presented in this letter to the editor does not include any patient identifiers or images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207