MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388199147 · doi:10.1063/5.0159840

Spatially homogeneous teleparallel gravity: Bianchi I

2023· article· en· W4388199147 on OpenAlexafffund
A. A. Coley, R. J. van den Hoogen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConnection (principal bundle)PhysicsSymmetry (geometry)Mathematical physicsDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Type (biology)Class (philosophy)Gauge (firearms)Spin connectionHomogeneousSpin (aerodynamics)Simple (philosophy)Gauge theoryGravitationClassical mechanicsMathematicsGeometryComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsStatistical physicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a recently developed algorithm that chooses preferred coordinates and a preferred co-frame, we will determine the completely general Bianchi type I teleparallel geometry. In using this algorithm, any remaining gauge freedom is allocated to the choice of spin connection. We then solve the symmetry constraints placed on the spin connection to derive a general class of Bianchi type I teleparallel geometries. We find that this general class of Bianchi type I teleparallel geometries breaks naturally into two sub-classes. We then illustrate some simple power-law solutions in F(T) teleparallel gravity for each case to illustrate the differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207