Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si les relations entre Autochtones et Allochtones sont relativement bien documentées au plan politico-institutionnel, notamment de la gouvernance, des relations de « nation à nation », et des négociations d’ententes territoriales, il s’avère que les modalités de cette rencontre, telle qu’elle se déploie au quotidien, demeurent quant à elles peu connues et valorisées. Dans cet article, nous nous intéressons à la cohabitation interculturelle, sur la Côte-Nord, entre la communauté innue de Nutashkuan et le village de Natashquan. À partir d’une démarche partenariale et interculturelle, nous explorons la cohabitation sur les territoires du quotidien, afin de mieux comprendre les facteurs de rapprochement et de distance au sein des communautés ainsi que dans l’arrière-pays, le Nitassinan, territoire ancestral innu, partagés depuis plus de 165 ans avec les Macacains et les Macacaines, de descendance acadienne. Notre article aboutit à une réflexion sur l’expérience des individus et des communautés dites périphériques en mettant de l’avant le vivre-ensemble.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".