MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388206315 · doi:10.7202/1106874ar

Transitions structurelles en périphérie québécoise

2023· article· fr· W4388206315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quand on croise la théorie des grands cycles structurels avec le modèle classique centre – périphérie, l’analyse de l’évolution de la périphérie du Québec génère un éclairage pertinent sur son contexte contemporain de développement. Après une période historique de simple extraction de ressources naturelles livrées sur le marché mondial, l’émergence d’activités économiques endogènes a joué son rôle de rétention progressive de la richesse créée, avant que les forces exogènes se réaffirment dans leur domination des flux financiers. À travers ce double renversement des forces, le processus d’intégration territoriale s’est avéré réel et constant, délaissant cependant les zones insuffisamment dotées en ressources ou bien dont les ressources ont été épuisées. La structure industrielle est demeurée immature et dépendante après les décollages locaux. Largement soutenue par la politique publique, la transition régionale en cours cherche sa voie en jonglant avec les options pour un nouveau grand cycle structurel de développement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it