Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quand on croise la théorie des grands cycles structurels avec le modèle classique centre – périphérie, l’analyse de l’évolution de la périphérie du Québec génère un éclairage pertinent sur son contexte contemporain de développement. Après une période historique de simple extraction de ressources naturelles livrées sur le marché mondial, l’émergence d’activités économiques endogènes a joué son rôle de rétention progressive de la richesse créée, avant que les forces exogènes se réaffirment dans leur domination des flux financiers. À travers ce double renversement des forces, le processus d’intégration territoriale s’est avéré réel et constant, délaissant cependant les zones insuffisamment dotées en ressources ou bien dont les ressources ont été épuisées. La structure industrielle est demeurée immature et dépendante après les décollages locaux. Largement soutenue par la politique publique, la transition régionale en cours cherche sa voie en jonglant avec les options pour un nouveau grand cycle structurel de développement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".