MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-Driven Approaches for Distribution Transformer Health Monitoring: A Review

2023· review· en· W4388207676 on OpenAlexaff
Aman Samson Mogos, Xiaodong Liang, C. Y. Chung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistribution transformerComputer scienceTransformerEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distribution transformers are the key components in distribution systems to maintain reliability of the system operation and reduce power outages. In this paper, a literature review is conducted on data-driven methods of the distribution transformer health monitoring by classifying the research streams and emphasizing advancements in machine learning, artificial intelligence and hybrid approaches in this area. The significance of data-driven methods is highlighted, demonstrating their ability to overcome traditional analytic limitations by providing real-time monitoring, prediction, and adaptability. As the distribution system continues to expand due to the increasing penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) and electric vehicles (EVs), data-driven techniques emerge as a dependable and adaptable option for the effective transformer health monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.306
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.078 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207