MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Battery Energy Storage and Their Ancillary Services with Renewable Energy: A Review

2023· review· en· W4388208337 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana Montoya Castillo, Xiaodong Liang, S.O. Faried

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyEnergy storageComputer scienceBattery (electricity)Battery storageElectrical engineeringEnvironmental economicsAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenhouse gas emission reduction goals set by the United Nations are urging countries all over the world to switch from traditional power generation to renewable energy, such as photovoltaic (PV) and wind power. Weather conditions highly affect these renewable energy (RE) plants’ power production, and uncontrollable weather changes may cause voltage and frequency unbalances in electric power grids. The lack of dispatchability of renewable energy sources (RES) forces grid operators to curtail the power generation at these RE plants if the demand is not high enough, wasting all the power that could have been generated at that time of the day. The integration of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) with these RE plants can mitigate the power quality issues and provide the power grid with a smooth and controlled output. In addition, the BESS can provide ancillary services to power plants and grid operators, such as frequency control and peak-shaving. The objective of this paper is to perform an in-depth literature review of BESS technologies and their current applications in power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207