MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of Reluctance Synchronous Motor Under Hybrid Fault Condition

2023· article· en· W4388208389 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Ghalavand, Latifa Yusuf, T. Ilamparithi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReluctance motorMagnetic reluctanceSwitched reluctance motorComputer scienceFault (geology)Synchronous motorControl theory (sociology)Direct torque controlInduction motorControl engineeringTorqueElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsVoltageGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A small degree of static eccentricity is inevitable due to manufacturing tolerances and assembly imperfections. Therefore, when stator inter-turn fault happens, it is important to analyze it along with static eccentric condition. Unfortunately, there is not much literature that analyzes such a condition. This paper focuses on the analysis of a Reluctance Synchronous Machine (RSM) when subjected to stator inter-turn and static eccentricity faults simultaneously. In particular, the work focuses on determining the impact of relative position between the minimum airgap point and the stator inter-turn fault. The goal of the paper is achieved by simulating a 1.5 hp, 4-pole, RSM using Finite Element (FE) software. Line current data is captured under different fault conditions and motor current signature analysis is carried out. Furthermore, the lower sideband harmonic frequency is reconstructed in time domain using Inverse Fourier Fast Transform. Clarke’s transformation is applied on the reconstructed harmonic frequency currents to estimate the alpha, beta components. Afterwards, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is implemented on the alpha, beta currents. The major benefits of the work include establishing the impact of hybrid faults on motor current signatures, developing a new measure to predict the relative position of the point of minimum airgap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207