5-Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Intralesional Triamcinolone and 5-Fluorouracil to Treat Acne Hypertrophic Scar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit. Improper treatment of acne can lead to skin lesions in some people. Acne hypertrophic scar is relatively rare, but it significantly affects the appearance and beauty, and usually has a great psychological and social impact on patients. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) solution in the treatment of acne hypertrophic scars. Methods: This article included 13 outpatients with acne accompanied by acne hypertrophic scar who were treated from September 2018 to September 2022. All patients received ALA-PDT combined with intralesional injection of 5-FU and TAC. At first, patients received ALA-PDT once every two weeks. After the third ALA-PDT, 5-FU and TAC were mixed in a ratio of 3:7, and then immediately injected in the local scars. The effect was observed after 1 month. If the effect is not obvious, a further injection of 5-FU and TAC to the lesion is necessary. The patients were followed up for 6 months. The Vancouver Scars Scale (VSS) was used to evaluate the efficacy before and after treatment and photos of patients were collected. Results: After ALA-PDT combined with intralesional 5-FU and TAC, all patients achieved good clinical efficacy. 23.08% of patients received one local injection and 76.92% received two local injections. After treatment, the scar lesions were reduced and flattened, and the scars became soft. The total score of VSS after treatment was significantly lower than before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The main adverse reactions were pain, erythema, and pigmentation, which can subside within 3 weeks. There was no recurrence after 6 months of follow-up. Conclusion: ALA-PDT combined with intralesional injection of 5-FU and TAC significantly affects acne hypertrophic scars, which is worthy of further in-depth and large-scale research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".