U–Pb zircon geochronology and geochemistry of the Jurassic magmatic rocks from the region of Cananea and Nacozari, northeastern Sonora, Mexico: timing and composition of the southernmost edge of the Jurassic continental arc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Igneous rocks of the Jurassic continental arc of southwest North American Cordillera crop out in the region between Cananea and Nacozari, in northeastern Sonora, Mexico. Contemporaneous igneous rocks occur farther south in the Nazas rift province; however, their tectonic affinity is debated between the southern extension of the Cordilleran arc and an origin associated with decompressive mantle melting during the Pangea breakup. We consider that the studied rocks represent the southernmost expression of the Jurassic continental arc. Four magmatic units are distinguished based on geology, U–Pb zircon geochronology, and geochemical composition. They comprise the Buenos Aires granite dated at 183.8 ± 1.1 Ma, the Mababi granite with ages of 175.5 ± 1.8, 173.5 ± 1.8, and 171.7 ± 1.0 Ma, the Elenita Formation volcanic rocks dated at 169.7 ± 1.7 Ma, and the Cerro Blanco granite dated at 162.3 ± 2.4 Ma. The studied samples correspond to highly differentiated rocks with high-silica contents (69–76 wt.%), low Mg# values (mostly <45), and alkali–calcic and peraluminous compositions suggesting crustal contamination. LREE-enriched normalized slopes with negative Eu anomalies and multielement plots characterized by well-developed negative anomalies of Nb–Ta, P, and Ti provide an unequivocal signal of the continental arc nature. In contrast to the Nazas province, where the Jurassic magmatism consists of discreet volcaniclastic sequences deposited in extensional basins with no evidence of plutonic rocks, the Jurassic continental arc of Arizona and northern Sonora forms a regionally coherent geological feature characterized by large exposures of volcanic and plutonic rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".