Self-supervised enhanced thyroid nodule detection in ultrasound examination video sequences with multi-perspective evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Ultrasound is the most commonly used examination for the detection and identification of thyroid nodules. Since manual detection is time-consuming and subjective, attempts to introduce machine learning into this process are ongoing. However, the performance of these methods is limited by the low signal-to-noise ratio and tissue contrast of ultrasound images. To address these challenges, we extend thyroid nodule detection from image-based to video-based using the temporal context information in ultrasound videos. Approach. We propose a video-based deep learning model with adjacent frame perception (AFP) for accurate and real-time thyroid nodule detection. Compared to image-based methods, AFP can aggregate semantically similar contextual features in the video. Furthermore, considering the cost of medical image annotation for video-based models, a patch scale self-supervised model (PASS) is proposed. PASS is trained on unlabeled datasets to improve the performance of the AFP model without additional labelling costs. Main results. The PASS model is trained by 92 videos containing 23 773 frames, of which 60 annotated videos containing 16 694 frames were used to train and evaluate the AFP model. The evaluation is performed from the video, frame, nodule, and localization perspectives. In the evaluation of the localization perspective, we used the average precision metric with the intersection-over-union threshold set to 50% (AP@50), which is the area under the smoothed Precision-Recall curve. Our proposed AFP improved AP@50 from 0.256 to 0.390, while the PASS-enhanced AFP further improved the AP@50 to 0.425. AFP and PASS also improve the performance in the valuations of other perspectives based on the localization results. Significance. Our video-based model can mitigate the effects of low signal-to-noise ratio and tissue contrast in ultrasound images and enable the accurate detection of thyroid nodules in real-time. The evaluation from multiple perspectives of the ablation experiments demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed AFP and PASS models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".