International Kindergarten Standards Included in the Palestinian Kindergarten Guide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the international kindergarten standards included in the Palestinian kindergarten guide, and to achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher adopted the descriptive analytical approach, and the study sample was the Palestinian kindergarten guide issued by the Ministry of Education in (2017). As for the study tool, the researcher modified the Emirati document that emerged from the British Columbia document and the Canadian-Canadian study (The Full-Day Early Learning Kindrgarten Program) The results of the analysis in the Palestinian kindergarten guide showed that the descending order of the topics of the twenty-first century is as follows: Health knowledge ranked first, followed by national awareness, environmental knowledge third, followed by community knowledge, and financial, economic, business and global awareness. The results of the study also revealed that the descending order of the twenty-first century skills for the basics of the future life of the learner in kindergarten included in the guide is as follows: The criterion of productivity and accountability ranked first, the criterion of communication and communication ranked second, in third place critical thinking and problem solving, in fourth place learning by innovation and creativity, and in fifth place came the criterion of initiative and self-direction, followed by the application of information technology in sixth place, in seventh place future leadership, followed by media knowledge in eighth place, and in ninth place it was obtained by the criterion of social and cultural skills, and in The tenth place is the criterion of information knowledge, while flexibility and adaptation received the last percentage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".