MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reply by Authors

2023· article· en· W4388215338 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohamad Abou Chakra, Neal D. Shore, Rachelle L. Dillon, Michael A. O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueUrology Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBladder cancerGemcitabineDocetaxelLibrary scienceFamily medicineUrologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessUrology PracticeOriginal Clinical Practice2 Nov 2023Reply by Authors Mohamad Abou Chakra, Neal D. Shore, Rachelle Dillon, and Michael A. O'Donnell Mohamad Abou ChakraMohamad Abou Chakra *Correspondence: Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (e-mail address: E-mail Address: [email protected] Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa , Neal D. ShoreNeal D. Shore Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina , Rachelle DillonRachelle Dillon Independent Clinical Consultant, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada , and Michael A. O'DonnellMichael A. O'Donnell Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000481.02AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Reply by Authors." Urology Practice, Publish Ahead of Print, pp. References 1. . US clinical practice patterns of intravesical chemotherapy for bacillus Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive and bacillus Calmette-Guérin–exposed nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Pract. 2024: 11(1):000-000. Google Scholar 2. . Comparison of sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel vs bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the treatment of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(2):e230849. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. . Long-term follow-up of sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel salvage therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2023; 41(3):148.e1-148.e7. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Mohamad Abou Chakra Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa *Correspondence: Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (e-mail address: E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Neal D. Shore Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina More articles by this author Rachelle Dillon Independent Clinical Consultant, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada More articles by this author Michael A. O'Donnell Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0130.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1850.143

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrology PracticeSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207