Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Adult Overhead Throwers: Imaging Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Overhead throwing, particularly in baseball, subjects the shoulder and elbow to various unique injuries. Capsular contracture following repetitive external rotation shifts the humeral head posterosuperiorly, predisposing to glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), Bennett, posterosuperior internal impingement (PSI), and superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions. GIRD represents loss of internal rotation at the expense of external rotation. Bennett lesion represents ossification of the posteroinferior glenohumeral ligament due to repetitive traction. PSI manifests with humeral head cysts and “kissing” tears of the posterosuperior cuff and labrum. Scapular dysfunction contributes to symptoms of PSI and predisposes to labral or rotator cuff disease. “Peel-back” or SLAP lesions occur when torsional forces detach the biceps-labral anchor from the glenoid. Finally, disorders of the anterior capsule, latissimus dorsi, teres major, and subscapularis are well recognized in overhead throwers. At the elbow, injuries typically involve the medial-sided structures. The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary static restraint to valgus stress and can be thickened, attenuated, ossified, and/or partially or completely torn. Medial epicondylitis can occur with tendinosis, partial tear, or complete rupture of the flexor-pronator mass and can accompany UCL tears and ulnar neuropathy. Posteromedial impingement (PMI) and valgus extension overload syndrome are related entities that follow abundant valgus forces during late cocking or acceleration, and deceleration. These valgus stresses wedge the olecranon into the olecranon fossa, leading to PMI, osteophytes, and intra-articular bodies. Other osseous manifestations include olecranon stress fracture and cortical thickening of the humeral shaft. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".