Effect of out of plane orientation on polarization second harmonic generation of single collagen fibrils
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy has emerged as a powerful technique for visualizing collagen organization within tissues. Amongst the many advantages of SHG is its sensitivity to collagen nanoscale organization, and its presumed sensitivity to the relative out of plane polarity of fibrils. Recent results have shown that circular dichroism SHG (CD-SHG), a technique that has been commonly assumed to reveal the relative out of plane polarity of collagen fibrils, is actually insensitive to changes in fibril polarity. However, results from another research group seem to contradict this conclusion. Both previous results have been based on SHG imaging of collagen fibrils within tissues, therefore, to gain a definitive understanding of the sensitivity of SHG to relative out of plane polarity, the results from individual fibrils are desirable. Here we present polarization resolved SHG microscopy (PSHG) data from individual collagen fibrils oriented out of the image plane by buckling on an elastic substrate. We show through correlation with atomic force microscopy measurements that SHG intensity can be used to estimate the out of plane angle of individual fibrils. We then compare the sensitivity of two PSHG techniques, CD-SHG and polarization-in, polarization-out SHG (PIPO-SHG), to the relative out of plane polarity of individual fibrils. We find that for single fibrils CD-SHG is insensitive to relative out of polarity and we also demonstrate the first direct experimental confirmation that PIPO-SHG reveals the relative out of plane polarity of individual collagen fibrils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it