3-D chromatin conformation, accessibility, and gene expression profiling of triple-negative breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited treatment options. Unlike other breast cancer subtypes, the scarcity of specific therapies and greater frequencies of distant metastases contribute to its aggressiveness. We aimed to find epigenetic changes that aid in the understanding of the dissemination process of these cancers. DATA DESCRIPTION: Using CRISPR/Cas9, our experimental approach led us to identify and disrupt an insulator element, IE8, whose activity seemed relevant for cell invasion. The experiments were performed in two well-established TNBC cellular models, the MDA-MB-231 and the MDA-MB-436. To gain insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of TNBC invasion ability, we generated and characterized high-resolution chromatin interaction (Hi-C) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) maps in both cell models and complemented these datasets with gene expression profiling (RNA-seq) in MDA-MB-231, the cell line that showed more significant changes in chromatin accessibility. Altogether, our data provide a comprehensive resource for understanding the spatial organization of the genome in TNBC cells, which may contribute to accelerating the discovery of TNBC-specific alterations triggering advances for this devastating disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".