MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decentralized Federated Deep Learning Image Recognition Models

2023· article· en· W4388235934 on OpenAlexaff
Md Quyyum Ul Islam, Rasha Kashef

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep learningServerArtificial intelligenceSoftware deploymentImage segmentationInformation privacyMachine learningEdge deviceData modelingObject detectionBig dataSegmentationAnalyticsFederated learningData miningCloud computingComputer securityComputer networkDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of IoT, numerous frameworks and cutting-edge models have been introduced to enhance user experience and privacy and reduce the risk of data breaches. Over time, IoT device usage has grown tremendously, and a flood of data has been sent to servers for processing. Federated learning has been deployed for efficient decentralization while preserving privacy. Federated learning has been applied in various IoT-related applications such as image classification, object segmentation, object detection, and sensor analytics. Existing centralized image recognition models fall short of providing accurate image classification with acceptable processing time for real-time deployment while preserving privacy. In this paper, we designed two decentralized deep learning models using federated learning, the CNN-TFF and the VGG16-TFF. With around 250 training iterations, we achieved a high accuracy rate of up to 90% with a decrease in the loss value for the CIFAR-100 dataset using the VGG16-TFF model while maintaining data privacy using federated learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207