Psychopathologie et effet placebo en clinique de la douleur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sans principe actif, le placebo ou le nocebo — du latin « je plairais » — provoque un effet bénéfique ou nocif par des mécanismes psychologiques, psychopathologiques et psychophysiologiques. De nombreuses études américaines, canadiennes et européennes ont relancé ces 20 dernières années la question du placebo et de ses effets, notamment dans le domaine de l’analgésie. La recherche a également montré que lorsque le sujet sait qu’on lui donne un placebo, les effets continuent de fonctionner, témoignant par là même qu’incorporation, introjection et relation sont déterminantes dans l’effet thérapeutique. La relation entre le médecin et le patient est nécessaire par ses vertus curatives propres, comme tout autre levier thérapeutique. C’est exactement ce que nous montrent le placebo et ses effets, qui à juste titre devraient être enseignés comme n’importe quel outil et levier thérapeutique en clinique de la douleur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".