MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388262663 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2023180

Effects of antiviral drugs on COVID-19 treatment

2023· article· en· W4388262663 on OpenAlexafffund
Min Luo, Junbo Jia, Ruiqi Wang, Lin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DrugCoronavirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2ReceptorDrug treatment2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedicineAntiviral drugVirologyImmunologyDiseaseVirusPharmacologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can target specific receptors on the cell surface and enter human host cells, causing the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Since SARS and COVID-19 have the same receptor blood angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), it is possible to apply the research on SARS to the treatment of COVID-19. In this work, via a mathematical model describing the interactions among uninfected healthy cells, infected cells and SARS-CoV-2, we analyze the effect of antiviral drugs on COVID-19 treatment. For two commonly used forms of drug intake, periodic and impulsive forms of drug intake, we identify the basic reproduction number $ R_{0} $ and study its relation to drug intake parameters and to the COVID-19 infection state. Our findings provide some interesting insights on COVID-19 treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - BSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207