An Interpretable Neonatal Lung Ultrasound Feature Extraction and Lung Sliding Detection System Using Object Detectors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop an interpretable system that could detect specific lung features in neonates. A challenging aspect of this work was that normal lungs showed the same visual features (as that of Pneumothorax (PTX)). M-mode is typically necessary to differentiate between the two cases, but its generation in clinics is time-consuming and requires expertise for interpretation, which remains limited. Therefore, our system automates M-mode generation by extracting Regions of Interest (ROIs) without human in the loop. Object detection models such as faster Region Based Convolutional Neural Network (fRCNN) and RetinaNet models were employed to detect seven common Lung Ultrasound (LUS) features. fRCNN predictions were then stored and further used to generate M-modes. Beyond static feature extraction, we used a Hough transform based statistical method to detect "lung sliding" in these M-modes. Results showed that fRCNN achieved a greater mean Average Precision (mAP) of 86.57% (Intersection-over-Union (IoU) = 0.2) than RetinaNet, which only displayed a mAP of 61.15%. The calculated accuracy for the generated RoIs was 97.59% for Normal videos and 96.37% for PTX videos. Using this system, we successfully classified 5 PTX and 6 Normal video cases with 100% accuracy. Automating the process of detecting seven prominent LUS features addresses the time-consuming manual evaluation of Lung ultrasound in a fast paced environment. Clinical impact: Our research work provides a significant clinical impact as it provides a more accurate and efficient method for diagnosing lung diseases in neonates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".