Remote Heart Rate Monitoring in Smart Environments From Videos With Self-Supervised Pretraining
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in deep learning have made it increasingly feasible to estimate heart rate (HR) remotely in smart environments by analyzing videos. However, a notable limitation of deep learning methods is their heavy reliance on extensive sets of labeled data for effective training. To address this issue, self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising avenue. Building on this, we introduce a solution that utilizes self-supervised contrastive learning for the estimation of remote photoplethysmography (PPG) and HR monitoring, thereby reducing the dependence on labeled data and enhancing performance. We propose the use of three spatial and three temporal augmentations for training an encoder through a contrastive framework, followed by utilizing the late-intermediate embeddings of the encoder for remote PPG and HR estimation. Our experiments on two publicly available data sets showcase the improvement of our proposed approach over several related works as well as supervised learning baselines, as our results approach the state of the art. We also perform thorough experiments to showcase the effects of using different design choices, such as the video representation learning method, the augmentations used in the pretraining stage, and others. We also demonstrate the robustness of our proposed method over the supervised learning approaches on reduced amounts of labeled data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".