MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388263819 · doi:10.1201/9781003260554-58

The houses of Gabriel García Márquez; the chronotope or a literary analysis of time and space

2023· book-chapter· en· W4388263819 on OpenAlex
Eduarda Barata

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime and space · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Magical Realism, García Márquez
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFederation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
KeywordsChronotopeGarciaArtHumanitiesLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an analytical perspective on time and space in three works of Colombian author Gabriel García Márquez El coronel no tiene quien le escriba (1961), Cien años de soledad (1967) and El otoño del patriarca (1975). More than the axis of narrative structure, time and space embody the nuclear core of the narratives in the house as a symbol, motif, and theme. Such corresponds to the notion of chronotope, as Mikhail Bakhtin studied it. In every narrative of this Colombian author, the houses intersect time and space, thus influencing decisively the threads and knots of the plot. Following the studies of Mikhail Bakhtin and his Dialogic Imagination and Gaston Bachelard’s La poétique de l’espace , this article offers a literary view on the relevance and impact of time and space in Gabriel García Márquez’s universe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it