On Investigating Dynamic Coupling in Floating Platform and Overhead Crane Interactions: Modeling and Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<title>Abstract</title> This study introduces a comprehensive model addressing the dynamic interaction between a crane and platform in the presence of realistic surge-roll-heave movements induced by ocean waves. While the motion of the payload is ascertainable, the surge-roll-heave motions of the floating platform are considered unknown. Consequently, we proposed a control design strategy integrating a backstepping controller and a high-gain observer. The primary objectives of this design are to accurately track the desired (linear) trajectories of the cart position and mitigate its swing (angular) motion. Moreover, the proposed controller is designed to handle challenges such as unknown dynamic friction, dynamic coupling, and external disturbances, all while ensuring dynamic. The extended high-gain observer is crucial in estimating dynamic states and external disturbances. Through simulation, we validate the effectiveness of our model-based control approach, demonstrating its robust performance in the face of unknown nonlinearities and disturbances caused by wave motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".