Influence of Daily Aerobic Exercise Duration on Phase 2 Cardiac Rehabilitation at a Rehabilitation Hospital and Health-Related Quality of Life After Discharge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Phase 2 in-patient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) at a rehabilitation hospital is now added the medical service fees in Japan and in light of the recent reimbursement for CR, a study needed to be performed to determine exertional exercise on its effectiveness and benefits to patients. We examined the effects of daily aerobic exercise duration on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) at 6 months after discharge from phase 2 CR. Methods: Of the 54 consecutive cardiovascular disease patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital after acute care, 43 were considered acceptable candidates for enrollment according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 40 patients completed study requirements, including return of a questionnaire on HR-QoL survey 6 months after discharge. The primary outcome was HR-QoL as evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L). Two multiple regression models were constructed to assess the influences of daily aerobic exercise duration (content of rehabilitation) and other clinicodemographic variables assessed during acute care (model 1) or at transfer from acute care to a rehabilitation hospital (model 2). Results: Both model 1, which included age, Barthel index of daily function before hospitalization, and daily aerobic exercise duration in the rehabilitation hospital (R 2 = 0.553, P < 0.001), and model 2, which included New York Heart Association functional classification at transfer, Charlson comorbidity index at transfer, and daily aerobic exercise duration (R 2 = 0.336, P = 0.002) identified aerobic exercise duration as a significant independent factor influencing HR-QoL at 6 months post-discharge (model 1: P = 0.041; model 2: P = 0.010). Conclusions: Enhanced daily aerobic exercise content during phase 2 in-hospital CR can significantly improve longer-term HR-QoL among cardiovascular disease patients independently of other clinicodemographic factors, including age, activities of daily living before treatment, and baseline condition at rehabilitation onset. These findings, that in the small sample size, support the continued expansion of phase 2 CR at a rehabilitation hospital in Japan. Cardiol Res. 2023;14(5):351-359 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1527
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".