Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the post-colonial literature in which we locate Luís Cardoso’s work, there is a concern in recovering and reconstructing individual and collective memories. In an attempt to give voice to the other side of history and to expose political vicissitudes, the narratives present an alternative reading of the past and alert to the direction that the instituted powers are giving to young nations. In the novel O Plantador de Abóboras [The Pumpkin Planter], the protagonist tells the story of three generations of her family, against the backdrop of the history of East Timor. This rescue of memories is carried out from a “balcony turned inside out”, in a place situated between the real and the imaginary, giving the literary appropriation of time and space takes on a fundamental dimension in revisiting the past and reading the present. With this article, I propose, therefore, to open a space of reflection around configurations that space, and time acquire in the novel, observing how both can be discussed in conjunction with the concepts of memory, heterotopia, and border. The development of our analysis is supported by the work of authors such as Edward Said, Saint Augustine, Michel Foucault, and Bill Ashcroft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".