Longitude differentiation of the hypoarctic butterfly fauna (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes the longitude-sector differentiation of the hypoarctic butterfly fauna. The authors estimate the species richness of the Papilionoidea superfamily in the hypoarctic zone for 120-130 native species. The richness of native species in the butterfly faunas of particular geographical sectors is about twice as less and relatively stable in the circumpolar perspective from Fennoscandia to Labrador. But, the species composition, geographical and landscape-zonal structure of regional butterfly faunas undergo serious changes. The Beringian species complex is highly specific and consists mainly of montane and arctic-montane species whose distribution is limited by the East Asian and West American sectors. The distribution analysis of species allowed us to conclude that the hypoarctic butterfly fauna is very heterogeneous. The zoogeographic unity of the Hypoarctic is not clearly manifested on the example of butterflies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it