Holistic Approach In Stroke Patients: A Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the holistic relationship between personality types, coping attitudes, physical functioning, and cognitive levels in individuals diagnosed with stroke. Material and Methods: The research employed a single-group design and included 25 stroke patients. The participants, comprising 7 females and 12 males with a mean age of 54.211±8.979 years, underwent a comprehensive assessment. Physical function was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale and Timed Up and Go Tests, and cognitive levels were measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, coping strategies were evaluated through the COPE-R Coping Attitudes Evaluation Scale, and personality types were determined using the Enneagram Scale. Results: A significant correlation was identified between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Timed Up and Go, and Berg Balance Scales (p<0.05). However, no significant correlation was observed between COPE-R Coping Attitudes and Enneagram scales (p=0.503). Conclusion: This study underscores the interplay between cognitive and physical functioning in stroke survivors, highlighting the potential impact of cognitive levels on physical capabilities. Surprisingly, coping attitudes and personality types did not significantly influence cognitive or physical function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".