Impacto de uma mesa redonda sobre orgasmo feminino realizada remotamente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diante da necessidade de promover um conhecimento satisfatório sobre o Orgasmo Feminino o projeto foi desenvolvido por quatro acadêmicas de Medicina de uma faculdade do interior de São Paulo, membras do Comitê de Saúde Sexual e Reprodutiva do IFMSA Brazil (SCORA), com o objetivo principal de combater as inverdades propagadas pela indústria pornográfica e promover mudanças de perspectivas em relação aos mitos disseminados pela cultura machista heteronormativa. Devido ao desconhecimento acerca do tema, à falta de prazer feminino na maior parte das relações sexuais, sobretudo as heterossexuais, e à crescente necessidade por empoderamento feminino como oposição à cultura machista vigente, o projeto visou promover ações de educação sexual, além de combate a mitos culturalmente enraizados. Foi desenvolvido inteiramente online na forma de uma mesa redonda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".