MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388287881 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3531931/v1

Diurnal dynamics of different circadian transcription modules in Chinese Pine needles and roots during dormancy introduction

2023· preprint· en· W4388287881 on OpenAlexaff
Junhe Yang, Kai Qu, Huili Wang, Liming Bian, Yousry A. El‐Kassaby, Wei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDormancyBiologyTranscriptomePinus tabulaeformisCircadian rhythmBotanyCircadian clockGibberellinGeneCell biologyEcologyGene expressionGeneticsNeuroscienceGermination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Winter dormancy ensures temperate zone’s trees proper response to environmental changes and enhances their adaptability. In northern hemisphere, conifers’ dormancy is induced by short-day and cold temperature. Previous studies have revealed that TFL2 is a key regulator involved in conifers’ bud set and growth cessation during the dormancy-induced phase. Based on the annual expression profile analysis of PtTFL2 in Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis Carr.), we identified key time nodes for dormancy initiation in autumn. To provide insight of the diurnal transcriptome dynamic in needles and roots during dormancy introduction, RNA-seq was performed at 12 consecutive time points in 24 hours under natural environment in Chinese pine. Interestingly, we found that both needles and roots have rhythmic oscillatory genes, even though the roots could not receive light signals directly. We constructed the transcription factor (TF) co-expression networks of needles and roots and in the core TF modules, we identified 10 hub genes in each. Revealed a network associated with the putative core clock genes (PtCCA1, PtPRR4, PtGI, and PtTCP42), which were also isolated, suggesting that they are important in the circadian regulation of the transcriptome. Regulatory network analysis identified key TFs associated with dormancy and cold acclimation in two tissues. Our results provide new insights into the molecular regulatory mechanisms involved in pine dormancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→