Religious Coping pada Penghafal Al-Qur’an dalam Menghadapi Fase Krisis Seperempat Baya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to obtain an overview of the strategies used by memorizers of the Quran in facing the quarter-life crisis phase. The quarter-life crisis is an emotional crisis related to doubt or anxiety about the future which is usually experienced by individuals aged 18-25 years. The research used qualitative phenomenological methods with thematic analysis. The participants were four students selected through purposive sampling. The results show that the area where the quarter-life crisis is most experienced is in the area of work. The causal factor is family life. The impacts can be negative, such as overthinking and anxiety; or positive, such as being able to learn lessons and be more aware of future challenges. Strategies for overcoming crises include preparing themselves by studying, reading the Quran, and believing that religion can help them face their life problems. The implications of this research emphasize that getting closer to Allah Swt. through the activity of reading and memorizing the Quran can strengthen individuals to face a quarter-life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".