MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388293056 · doi:10.32782/2522-1795.2023.16.6

REHABILITATION MANAGEMENT IN DISTAL SENSIMOTOR POLYNEUROPATHY OF DIABETIC GENESIS

2023· article· uk· W4388293056 on OpenAlex
О. В. Лянна, Yu. M. Malyarova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueРеабілітаційні та фізкультурно-рекреаційні аспекти розвитку людини (Rehabilitation & recreation) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeripheral neuropathyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rehabilitation assistance to patients with diabetic polyneuropathy is a difficult multidisciplinary task, and its solution should be complex based on the application of pathogenetically justified medicinal and non-medicinal methods. Regardless of the presence of complications and their degree of severity, the main strategies for the rehabilitation of such patients include: glycemic control, diet therapy, medicinal pathogenetic therapy, physiotherapeutic methods of treatment, physical therapy (kinesiotherapy) and reflexology. The purpose of the study is to develop, scientifically justify and implement the algorithm of the physical therapy program for patients with distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy of diabetic origin. Research methods. The following research methods were used to achieve the goals and objectives of the specified research: at the level of structure / function according to the ICF: clinical examination, which included an assessment of complaints, anamnesis; neuropathy symptom scale (Neurological Symptom Scores, NSS); Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS); NTSS‑9 (Neuropathy Total Symptom Score‑9) scale of symptoms of diabetic distal neuropathy; visual analog pain scale; McGill Pain Questionnaire; manual muscle testing; at the level of activity and participation: questionnaire SF‑36 (Short Form – 36); the “Timed Up and Go test/TUG” test. All patients included in the study underwent clinical and special research methods that meet the standards of research in this pathology and are based on the ICF. The study was conducted on the basis of the Municipal non-profit enterprise “Clinical Hospital of Saint Panteleimon” of the Sumy City Council in the conditions of the department of physical and rehabilitation medicine. The study included 10 patients (7 women and 3 men) with type 2 diabetes mellitus of moderate severity in a state of compensation or subcompensation, complicated by distal sensorimotor diabetic polyneuropathy. Research results. Based on the analysis of theoretical data and materials of own research, an algorithm of the physical therapy program for patients with distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy of diabetic genesis was developed, depending on the severity of the pain syndrome and the severity of the clinical manifestations of diabetic polyneuropathy according to the scale of neurological symptoms of the NSS. The findings identified risk factors for the development of pain syndrome and revealed that the degree of impaired balance and movement in patients with diabetes inversely depends on the severity of neurological symptoms and the intensity of pain syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it