УТЕРЯННЫЙ КЛАД РИМСКИХ МОНЕТ, ПРЕДПОЛОЖИТЕЛЬНО НАЙДЕННЫЙ В СЕВЕРНОЙ БОЛГАРИИ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The object of the study is a coin hoard that probably belonged to a Bulgarian collector. The hoard was identified before the Law on Cultural Heritage came into force and there is no exact information about both its whereabouts and discovery. There are some reasons to believe that the hoard was found in Northern Bulgaria. The idea of its composition is only based on photos; the measurements and weights of the coins are not available. One hundred and twelve silver coins of the period 175—243 CE were deposited, specifically 111 denarii and one antoninian. One cannot be sure of the accuracy of the available information about the actual amount of the hoard. However, the coin complex deserves publication, since it enables the clarification of our understanding of the composition of monetary circulation in Northern Bulgaria in the 3rd quarter of the 2nd — in the 1st half of the 3rd century. Объектом исследования является клад монет, принадлежавший, вероятно, болгарскому коллекционеру. Точные данные о месте его обнаружения отсутствуют; есть основания полагать, что он найден в Северной Болгарии. Клад был идентифицирован до вступления в силу Закона о культурном наследии, и в настоящее время его судьба неизвестна. Сведения о составе клада основаны только на фотоматериалах, метрические и весовые данные монет отсутствуют. В него попало 112 серебряных монет периода 175—243 гг., а точнее — 111 денариев и 1 антониниан. Мы не можем быть уверены в точности имеющейся информации о первоначальном составе и количестве монет клада. В любом случае, этот монетный комплекс заслуживает публикации, т. к. сведения об отложившихся в нём монетах позволяют уточнить наши представления о составе денежного обращения в Северной Болгарии в третьей четверти II — первой половине III в.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".