MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388305494 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.a911021

Northern Sparks: Innovation, Technology Policy, and the Arts in Canada from Expo 67 to the Internet Age by Michael Century (review)

2023· article· en· W4388305494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosThe artsPoliticsHistory of technologySociologyGeopoliticsSovereigntyPolitical scienceHistoryLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Northern Sparks: Innovation, Technology Policy, and the Arts in Canada from Expo 67 to the Internet Age by Michael Century Dawna Schuld (bio) Northern Sparks: Innovation, Technology Policy, and the Arts in Canada from Expo 67 to the Internet Age By Michael Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022. Pp. 280. Northern Sparks introduces an "alternative technological ethos" that developed in Canada over the last three decades of the twentieth century, when the mutually constitutive relationship of technology to culture was overtly acknowledged and purposely experimental. This distinctly Canadian alternative occupied productive borders between art and industry, emphasized embodied interaction with technology, and exemplified an improvisatory approach to social structures. The book is a challenge to technologically deterministic accounts of creative progress that characterize current debates about social media and artificial intelligence. Instead, like the narrator in a science fiction alternate history plot, author Michael Century guides readers through a series of historical case studies that show how technology and culture might have codeveloped if publicly mandated but human-scaled intermedial models had prevailed. A number of Canada's geopolitical particularities are foundational to its history as an important borderline case: its physical vastness, which necessitates an innovative communications policy; its cultural diversity, playing out against Québecois claims to cultural and political sovereignty; its historical ties to Great Britain and France; and its proximity to and economic entanglement with the United States. As Century describes it, Canada's borderline status prompted creative challenges that were also advantages—it was not a major player in technological development but was adjacent to power and had access to cutting-edge industrial and educational resources. Indeed, it can be argued that Canada's marginal positioning afforded leading theorists like Marshall McLuhan the necessary critical perspective to recognize artistic insight as an essential component in ethical technological development. Following McLuhan's lead, this is less a history of technology and culture as it is one of technology as culture. The book describes a society of innovators—artists, electrical engineers, and bureaucrats—who influenced the trajectory of computer animation, human-computer interaction, sound engineering and generative music, [End Page 1318] cultural networking, and virtual reality. The history of an alternative art and technology ethos in the United States involved the sometimes paradoxical role of industry players like IBM and Bell Labs. But in Canada, where until 1979 communications policy and cultural programs were administered in the same department, public servants were innovators and artists were public servants. The impact of these policies is more than theoretical, and Century brings valuable insight through his personal experience in the bureaucratic trenches as a consultant to the Ministry of Communications and Culture (and later the Ministry of Heritage) and as the founding director of the Banff Centre's media arts division. Northern Sparks is a critical overview, and much of its contents warrant further scholarship in media arts history, especially regarding Canada's efforts to name and claim a distinct cultural identity, a fraught history only sketched out here. Century's emphasis is on the salient effects of an alternative ethos, and the book is organized according to the sensory, technical, and social mechanisms of interaction. Within this framework, he produces a history of intersections—of ideas and people—as elaborated via case studies. An account of the filmmaker Norman McLaren is particularly unexpected and instructive, though I'm not fully convinced by the claim that his experiments with the National Film Board were "proto-computational," which lends a (perhaps unintended) inevitability to technological progress that belies the more open-ended possibilities of McLaren's "bricoleur" approach. McLaren is also something of an outlier in a history that is marked by the 1967 Montréal Expo—a techno-utopian high point—at one end and, at the other, the 1992 signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the effective endpoint of Canada's erstwhile borderline status. But that is not to say that the borderline ethos is no longer relevant. One of the most intriguing narratives in the book involves the Telidon network launched in 1978, a "national videotext system" that failed to attract the users it purported to serve. Century contrasts this top-down approach...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it