MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388305494 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.a911021

Northern Sparks: Innovation, Technology Policy, and the Arts in Canada from Expo 67 to the Internet Age by Michael Century (review)

2023· article· en· W4388305494 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthosThe artsPoliticsHistory of technologySociologyGeopoliticsSovereigntyPolitical scienceHistoryLawArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Northern Sparks: Innovation, Technology Policy, and the Arts in Canada from Expo 67 to the Internet Age by Michael Century Dawna Schuld (bio) Northern Sparks: Innovation, Technology Policy, and the Arts in Canada from Expo 67 to the Internet Age By Michael Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022. Pp. 280. Northern Sparks introduces an "alternative technological ethos" that developed in Canada over the last three decades of the twentieth century, when the mutually constitutive relationship of technology to culture was overtly acknowledged and purposely experimental. This distinctly Canadian alternative occupied productive borders between art and industry, emphasized embodied interaction with technology, and exemplified an improvisatory approach to social structures. The book is a challenge to technologically deterministic accounts of creative progress that characterize current debates about social media and artificial intelligence. Instead, like the narrator in a science fiction alternate history plot, author Michael Century guides readers through a series of historical case studies that show how technology and culture might have codeveloped if publicly mandated but human-scaled intermedial models had prevailed. A number of Canada's geopolitical particularities are foundational to its history as an important borderline case: its physical vastness, which necessitates an innovative communications policy; its cultural diversity, playing out against Québecois claims to cultural and political sovereignty; its historical ties to Great Britain and France; and its proximity to and economic entanglement with the United States. As Century describes it, Canada's borderline status prompted creative challenges that were also advantages—it was not a major player in technological development but was adjacent to power and had access to cutting-edge industrial and educational resources. Indeed, it can be argued that Canada's marginal positioning afforded leading theorists like Marshall McLuhan the necessary critical perspective to recognize artistic insight as an essential component in ethical technological development. Following McLuhan's lead, this is less a history of technology and culture as it is one of technology as culture. The book describes a society of innovators—artists, electrical engineers, and bureaucrats—who influenced the trajectory of computer animation, human-computer interaction, sound engineering and generative music, [End Page 1318] cultural networking, and virtual reality. The history of an alternative art and technology ethos in the United States involved the sometimes paradoxical role of industry players like IBM and Bell Labs. But in Canada, where until 1979 communications policy and cultural programs were administered in the same department, public servants were innovators and artists were public servants. The impact of these policies is more than theoretical, and Century brings valuable insight through his personal experience in the bureaucratic trenches as a consultant to the Ministry of Communications and Culture (and later the Ministry of Heritage) and as the founding director of the Banff Centre's media arts division. Northern Sparks is a critical overview, and much of its contents warrant further scholarship in media arts history, especially regarding Canada's efforts to name and claim a distinct cultural identity, a fraught history only sketched out here. Century's emphasis is on the salient effects of an alternative ethos, and the book is organized according to the sensory, technical, and social mechanisms of interaction. Within this framework, he produces a history of intersections—of ideas and people—as elaborated via case studies. An account of the filmmaker Norman McLaren is particularly unexpected and instructive, though I'm not fully convinced by the claim that his experiments with the National Film Board were "proto-computational," which lends a (perhaps unintended) inevitability to technological progress that belies the more open-ended possibilities of McLaren's "bricoleur" approach. McLaren is also something of an outlier in a history that is marked by the 1967 Montréal Expo—a techno-utopian high point—at one end and, at the other, the 1992 signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the effective endpoint of Canada's erstwhile borderline status. But that is not to say that the borderline ethos is no longer relevant. One of the most intriguing narratives in the book involves the Telidon network launched in 1978, a "national videotext system" that failed to attract the users it purported to serve. Century contrasts this top-down approach...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,757
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,873

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle