MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Old Élites in a New City: Restructuring the Leopold Quarter and the Europeanization of Brussels

2003· book-chapter· en· W4388314072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guy Baeten

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsRestructuringQuarter (Canadian coin)MulticulturalismPower (physics)Political scienceCapital (architecture)Socioeconomic statusPolitical economyEconomic powerCorporate governanceEconomyDevelopment economicsGeographySociologyEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Europeanization has triggered substantial economic, political, and cultural change in the city of Brussels. It has evolved from a relatively unimportant national capital to one of the most multicultural and cosmopolitan cities in the world, exerting substantial political and economic power in Europe and the rest of the world. More than one-third of Brussels’s inhabitants are now of foreign origin. In this chapter, I will argue that, in spite of this dramatic post-war socioeconomic and demographic change and this new cosmopolitan reality, Brussels is still governed by traditional political and economic elites operating within well-tested formats of urban governance and urban planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCross-Border Cooperation and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207