MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388327937 · doi:10.1145/3600100.3626257

CityLearn v2: An OpenAI Gym environment for demand response control benchmarking in grid-interactive communities

2023· article· en· W4388327937 on OpenAlexaff
Kingsley Nweye, Kathryn Kaspar, Giacomo Buscemi, Giuseppe Pinto, Han Li, Tianzhen Hong, Mohamed Ouf, Alfonso Capozzoli, Zoltán Nagy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmarkingFlexibility (engineering)Computer scienceGridDemand responseDistributed computingControl (management)Virtual power plantDistributed generationElectricityEngineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As more distributed energy resources become part of the demand-side infrastructure, it is important to quantify the energy flexibility they provide, as well as identify the best control strategies to accelerate their real-world adoption. CityLearn provides an environment for benchmarking of simple and advanced control algorithms in virtual grid-interactive communities. The updated CityLearn v2 environment introduced here extends the v1 environment to provide load shedding flexibility through heating ventilation and air conditioning power control coupled with a data-driven temperature dynamics model. The updated environment also includes the functionality to assess the resiliency of control algorithms during power outage events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207