MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388328891 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.00904

Disentangling transport mechanisms in a correlated oxide by photoinduced charge injection

2023· preprint· en· W4388328891 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Henry Navarro, Sarmistha Das, Felipe Torres, Rourav Basak, Erbin Qiu, Nicolás M. Vargas, Pavel N. Lapa, Iván K. Schuller, Alex Frañó

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchResearch Corporation for Science AdvancementNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVariable-range hoppingMaterials scienceBilayerOxideChemical physicsCharge carrierMechanism (biology)Charge (physics)OptoelectronicsWork (physics)NanotechnologyChemistryMembraneThermal conductionPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel heterostructured approach to disentangle the mechanism of electrical transport of the strongly correlated PrNiO3, by placing the nickelate under the photoconductor CdS. This enables the injection of carriers into PrNiO3 in a controlled way, which can be used to interrogate its intrinsic transport mechanism. We find a non-volatile resistance decrease when illuminating the system at temperatures below the PrNiO3 metal-insulator transition. The photoinduced change becomes more volatile as the temperature increases. These data help understand the intrinsic transport properties of the nickelate-CdS bilayer. Together with data from a bare PrNiO3 film, we find that the transport mechanism includes a combination of mechanisms including both thermal activation and variable range hopping. At low temperatures without photoinduced carriers the transport is governed by hopping, while at higher temperatures and intense illumination the activation mechanism becomes relevant. This work shows a new way to optically control the low-temperature resistance of PrNiO3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207