Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract When the American Revolution began in April 1775, the Continental Congress that directed the fledgling war effort realized the importance of Canada. From there, the British could send wounded in the leg in the process. He was evacuated and Colonel Daniel Morgan assumed command. He led the men over the barricade and captured a number of defenders, then pressed on. Unfortunately, his command was becoming disorganized owing to the bad weather and the fighting; his prisoners out-numbered his own force. At a second barricade they halted, for this was their rendezvous point with Montgomery. Little did they know that Montgomery lay dead just past Point Diamond and his command had retreated in confusion. There was to be no reinforcement. At dawn the defenders sallied past the barricade but were turned back after Morgan led a counterattack. Unfortunately, behind the second barricade stood a double rank of fusiliers whose fire decimated Morgan’s men. An attempt to outflank them failed, and Morgan’s men began to retreat. Carleton, however, had sent a force behind them to block their withdrawal. After a brief stand in some of the houses, the Americans were forced to surrender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.358 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".