MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388339813 · doi:10.31893/multiscience.2024049

Soft computing approach for feature extraction of palm biometric

2023· article· en· W4388339813 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMultidisciplinary Science Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsConvolutional neural networkComputer sciencePalm printPalmArtificial intelligenceFeature extractionIdentification (biology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Artificial neural networkComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method for developing a secure and reliable identification system relies on the use of biometrics. In this case, the palm vein is used as a security measure. The proposed system is powered by a convolutional neural network, which is a type of neural network that is commonly utilized for image recognition. The palm vein's visual features are extracted using a convolutional neural network. This method can improve the recognition rate and its performance parameters. The results of an experiment conducted with this method were better than those obtained with conventional techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.019
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it