MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Settlers and Squatters

2009· book-chapter· en· W4388350357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Kenny

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInheritance (genetic algorithm)BrotherNothingQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryGenealogyLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract When William Penn died, none of his three sons with Hannah Callowhill Penn—John “the American,” Thomas, and Richard—had reached twenty-one, the age of inheritance. Hannah had been running Pennsylvania since her husband’s incapacitation in 1712, and she continued to do so until her death in 1726. She bequeathed half of Pennsylvania to John and a quarter each to Thomas and Richard. The inheritance, however, was contested. William Penn had an older son, almost twenty years John Penn’s senior, from his first marriage. William Penn Jr. received land in Ireland from his father’s will but nothing in Pennsylvania, which he believed was rightfully his. He disputed the inheritance until his death in 1720, and his son Springett continued the dispute until he died in 1731. Springett’s brother, William Penn III, then executed a release of his claims on Pennsylvania, and the case was finally resolved in favor of the Callowhill Penns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→