MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chapter Four

2004· book-chapter· en· W4388388729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Olivelle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicJoseph Conrad and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreaturesHarmLivelihoodQuarter (Canadian coin)Subsistence agricultureWifeDutyHistoryPsychologyLawAgriculturePolitical scienceSocial psychologyNatural (archaeology)Archaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After spending the first quarter of his life at his teacher’s, a twice-born man should marry a wife and spend the second quarter of his life at home. Except during a time of adversity, a Brahmin ought to sustain himself by following a livelihood that causes little or no harm* to creatures. 3He should gather wealth just sufficient for his subsistence through irreproachable activities that are specific to him, without fatiguing his body. Let him sustain himself by means of “true” and “immortal,” or by means of “mortal” and “fatal,” or even by means of “truth-cum-falsehood”; but under no circumstances by means of the “dog’s life.” Gleaning and picking should be considered the “true”; what is received unasked is the “immortal”; almsfood that is begged is the “mortal”; and agriculture, tradition says, is the “fatal.” 6Trade is the “truth-cum-falsehood,” and he may sustain himself even by that. Service is called the “dog’s life”; therefore, he should avoid it altogether.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5380.305

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicJoseph Conrad and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207