MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pulsed Methods for Flow Velocity Estimation and Imaging

2006· book-chapter· en· W4388390386 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoppler effectObserver (physics)Relative motionPhysicsWavelengthStarsAcousticsAstrophysicsOpticsAstronomyClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The question as to whether pulsed Doppler makes use of the Doppler effect has been considered on several occasions. To address this question in a satisfactory manner requires that we first agree on a definition of the effect that bears Doppler’s name. Christian Doppler studied the optical spectrum emitted by stars and proposed a theory that described the change in wavelength (frequency) of each component of the received spectrum caused by the relative movement of the source and observer. It is clear from the discussion in Chapter 9 that when a CW acoustic source is used and there is relative motion between the source and target, the apparent change in frequency should be referred to as the Doppler effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207