MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Overlord

2005· book-chapter· en· W4388394578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew D. Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficerResidenceService (business)ManagementHistoryEngineeringOperations researchArchaeologyArt historySociologyDemographyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The headquarters of Combined Operations (COHQ) occupied what was formerly the town house of the Dukes of Buccleuch, in Richmond Terrace. One of the more volatile and cantankerous characters in residence during 1942–3 was Evelyn Waugh, the novelist. He was there as Liaison Officer representing the Special Service Brigade, until he was forced out by his senior officers for constantly causing trouble. He was often drunk. The week after Bernal returned from his travels, Waugh arrived for lunch with Mountbatten ‘rather tipsy’ and ‘found the house a nest of Communists’, suggesting that Sage was back at work. Habbakuk remained the highest priority for Bernal, although the Canadians were not pressing ahead with a large-scale model and there seemed no prospect of an operational berg ship until 1945. A meeting was held at COHQ to review the situation at the end of May; Bernal stated that he still believed a berg ship was feasible and that Pykrete was the best material to use. Perutz indicated that 1.7 million tons of Pykrete in block form would need to be produced during the next Canadian winter to construct one berg ship ready for use in 1945.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6770.309

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→