Improving Creative Problem-Solving Abilities of English Students through HyFlex Learning Management and Project-Based Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Creative problem-solving ability is one of the important skills that need to be developed within learners through appropriate and supportive learning experiences. This research aims to 1) assess the students’ creative problem-solving abilities after engaging in HyFlex learning combined with project-based learning; 2) evaluate the students’ innovations after engaging in HyFlex learning combined with project-based learning; and 3) study students’ opinions regarding HyFlex learning combined with project-based learning. The sample group employed cluster random sampling consisting of 30 second-year English major students. The research tools included an assessment of creative problem-solving abilities, an assessment of innovation, and a questionnaire about students’ opinions regarding HyFlex learning combined with project-based learning. Statistical analysis involved means and standard deviations. The research findings were as follows: 1) Students have the highest level of creative problem-solving abilities; 2) Innovations created by students have the highest average score; 3) Students’ opinions toward HyFlex learning combined with project-based learning are at the highest level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it