MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sintomas vestibulares associados ao hipotireoidismo após infecção por COVID-19: relato de caso

2023· article· pt· W4388407604 on OpenAlexaff
Larissa Vianna, Maria Cristina Alves Corazza, Bianca Simone Zeigelboim, Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda

Bibliographic record

VenueTuiuti · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVestibular systemAudiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os efeitos da infecção por SARS-CoV-2, responsável pela COVID-19, desde o início de 2020, foram descritos em muitas pesquisas realizadas até hoje. A doença, inicialmente vista como respiratória, mostrou-se complexa, afetando diversos órgãos e sistemas, incluindo auditivo, vestibular, cardiovascular, endócrino e neurológico. Algumas pessoas continuam com sintomas após a resolução da infecção, chamada de COVID-19 longa. Há indícios de que o vírus afete a glândula tireoide, desempenhando um papel em distúrbios tireoidianos. O artigo descreve um caso de um paciente masculino de 44 anos, antes saudável, que desenvolveu sintomas de vertigem após ter COVID-19. Além disso, foi diagnosticado com hipotireoidismo, uma condição caracterizada pela insuficiência dos hormônios tireoidianos. Após a infecção, o paciente apresentou queixa de tontura, cefaleia e alteração na pressão arterial. Os exames realizados revelaram alteração tireoidiana, confirmando o hipotireoidismo, e indicaram uma disfunção vestibular periférica à esquerda. Esse estudo destaca a possível relação entre a infecção por COVID-19 e alterações na glândula tireoide, bem como seus efeitos no sistema vestibular, contribuindo para uma compreensão mais abrangente das complicações da doença.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTuiutiSame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207