MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388410090 · doi:10.1101/2023.11.04.565620

MiRGraph: A hybrid deep learning approach to identify microRNA-target interactions by integrating heterogeneous regulatory network and genomic sequences

2023· preprint· en· W4388410090 on OpenAlexaff
Pei Liu, Ying Liu, Jiawei Luo, Yue Li

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsmicroRNAComputational biologyTransformerENCODEGeneSequence labelingBiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeneticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) mediates gene expression regulation by targeting specific messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in the cytoplasm. They can function as both tumor suppressors and oncogenes depending on the specific miRNA and its target genes. Detecting miRNA-target interactions (MTIs) is critical for unraveling the complex mechanisms of gene regulation and promising towards RNA therapy for cancer. There is currently a lack of MTIs prediction methods that simultaneously perform feature learning from heterogeneous gene regulatory network (GRN) and genomic sequences. To improve the prediction performance of MTIs, we present a novel transformer-based multiview feature learning method – MiRGraph, which consists of two main modules for learning the sequence-based and GRN-based feature embedding. For the former, we utilize the mature miRNA sequences and the complete 3’UTR sequence of the target mRNAs to encode sequence features using a hybrid transformer and convolutional neural network (CNN) (TransCNN) architecture. For the latter, we utilize a heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) module to extract the relational and structural information from the GRN consisting of miRNA-miRNA, gene-gene and miRNA-target interactions. The TransCNN and HGT modules can be learned end-to-end to predict experimentally validated MTIs from MiRTarBase. MiRGraph outperforms existing methods in not only recapitulating the true MTIs but also in predicting strength of the MTIs based on the in-vitro measurements of miRNA transfections. In a case study on breast cancer, we identified plausible target genes of an oncomir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207