Partitioning autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration in an ombrotrophic bog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Northern peatlands are globally significant carbon stores, but the sink strength varies from year to year due to changes in environmental conditions. Ecosystem respiration (ER) is composed of both autotrophic respiration (AR) that consists of respiration by plant parts, and heterotrophic respiration (HR) that consists of respiration by microbial bacteria in the soil, fungi, etc. Manual measurements only crudely partition AR and HR, which may lead to erroneous estimates if a change favours one form of respiration over another and may influence our interpretation in the magnitude of respiration. HR has also been thought to be more linked to vegetation dynamics, particularly in wetter, sedge-dominated ecosystems like fens. It is unknown whether such plant-soil-root interactions influence HR in peatlands dominated by woody shrubs whose water table is located further below the surface. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine the contributions of AR and HR at Mer Bleue, an ombrotrophic bog, 2) explore how environmental conditions influence ER and its components, 3) determine how different methodological approaches (e.g. directly measured respiration using automatic chambers vs. extrapolated calculations) can influence our interpretation in the magnitude of respiration, and 4) compare the respiration dynamics with those found in the literature for other peatland types. Our results revealed differences in AR and HR contributions to ER compared to other peatland types reported in the literature. The AR/HR ratio was 3.0 and AR contributions to ER were ∼75% at our study bog, which is generally higher than AR contributions from fens, but also decreased substantially during extended drier periods. HR contributions increased with rising temperature and water table depth. Directly measured ER was smaller than when ER was estimated using night-time relationships with temperature. The magnitude of ER changed depending on the plant biomass, which we believe to be a result of vegetation dynamics influencing HR. The results of this study improved our understanding of peatland carbon cycling as well as the conceptualization of HR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".