MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P143 Difficulties in diagnosing tuberculosis during the COVID-19 pandemic – observational report from a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai (India)

2023· article· en· W4388410545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vipul Nanda, Girija Nair, Abhay Uppe, Nikhil Sarangdhar, Shahid Patel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTuberculosisPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Observational studyHealth careQuarter (Canadian coin)PediatricsDiseaseInternal medicineEconomic growthGeographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Objective The COVID 19 pandemic caused significant disturbances in TB diagnostic and treatment services under national tuberculosis elimination programme (NTEP) in India. As India accounts for 28% of global burden, ending Tuberculosis globally is critically dependent on ending it in India. More than quarter of the world’s 10 million estimated cases and 449,700 of the world’s estimated 1.3 million TB related deaths occur in India. Between 2020 and 2025, 6 million TB cases and 1.4 million TB-related deaths are expected to occur in India. Due to lockdowns or movement restrictions, fear of contracting COVID-19 infection in hospital settings and diversion of TB services, patients with TB symptoms are having difficulty accessing healthcare facilities during this epidemic. The Objective of this study is to identify the real-world practical difficulties faced by TB patients during the COVID 19 pandemic during the second wave from March 2021 to October 2021 in India. Methods Figure 1. Results Out of 100 patients diagnosed with drug sensitive Tuberculosis, 42% were COVID-19 suspects.38% had symptoms for less than one month which helped in early diagnosis of Tuberculsosis.6% patients had symptoms for more than 6 months.27% patients faced problems getting diagnosed, out of which 14 patients (51.8%) had travel difficulty, 7 patients (25.9%) had financial problems and 6 patients (22.2%) had lack of health care access. The time taken for diagnosis and starting medication under National TB elimination program (NTEP) was 1–3 days in 47% patients, 4–7 days in 32% patients and 8 or more days in 21% patients. 31% of patients had side effects due to anti-tuberculosis treatment, amongst them 23 (74.1%) patients complained vomiting, 5 (16.1%) patients had itching, 3 patients (9.6%) had joint pains. 84% patients received regular supply of anti-tuberculosis medication and 16% faced problems in access.79% patients had access to high protein diet whereas 21% patients had no access. Conclusion This study highlights the consequences and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Tuberculosis healthcare services. It highlights the problems faced during the COVID-19 lockdown by Tuberculosis patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→