MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388412710 · doi:10.1161/jaha.123.030229

Prognostic Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance–Based Phenotyping in Patients With Muscular Dystrophy

2023· article· en· W4388412710 on OpenAlexaff
Niharika Kashyap, Anish Nikhanj, Dina Labib, Easter Prosia, Sandra Rivest, Jacqueline Flewitt, Gerald Pfeffer, Jeffrey A. Bakal, Zaeem A. Siddiqi, Richard Coulden, Richard B. Thompson, James A. White, Gavin Y. Oudit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInterquartile rangeInternal medicineHazard ratioEjection fractionMuscular dystrophyCohortMagnetic resonance imagingLimb-girdle muscular dystrophyMyotonic dystrophyCardiac magnetic resonance imagingHeart failureConfidence intervalRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, including strain analysis and tissue characterization, has not been comprehensively investigated in adult patients with muscular dystrophy. Methods and Results We prospectively enrolled 148 patients with dystrophinopathies (including heterozygotes), limb‐girdle muscular dystrophy, and type 1 myotonic dystrophy (median age, 36.0 [interquartile range, 23.0–50.0] years; 51 [34.5%] women) over 7.7 years in addition to an age‐ and sex–matched healthy control cohort (n=50). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance markers, including 3‐dimensional strain and fibrosis, were assessed for their respective association with major adverse cardiac events. Our results showed that markers of contractile performance were reduced across all muscular dystrophy groups. In particular, the dystrophinopathies cohort experienced reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and high burden of replacement fibrosis. Patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy showed a 26.8% relative reduction in LV mass with corresponding reduction in chamber volumes. Eighty‐two major adverse cardiac events occurred over a median follow‐up of 5.2 years. Although LV ejection fraction was significantly associated with major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.0 [95% CI, 1.4–6.4]) after adjusting for covariates, peak 3‐dimensional strain amplitude demonstrated greater predictive value (minimum principal amplitude: aHR, 5.5 [95% CI, 2.5–11.9]; maximum principal amplitude: aHR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.6–6.8]; circumferential amplitude: aHR, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.6–7.2]; longitudinal amplitude: aHR, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.7–6.9]; and radial strain amplitude: aHR, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.4–6.1]). Minimum principal strain yielded incremental prognostic value beyond LV ejection fraction for association with major adverse cardiac events (change in χ 2 =13.8; P <0.001). Conclusions Cardiac dysfunction is observed across all muscular dystrophy subtypes; however, the subtypes demonstrate distinct phenotypic profiles. Myocardial deformation analysis highlights unique markers of principal strain that improve risk assessment over other strain markers, LV ejection fraction, and late gadolinium enhancement in this vulnerable patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart AssociationSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207