MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388417379 · doi:10.1080/00036846.2023.2273242

“Good” and “bad” volatilities: a realized semivariance GARCH approach

2023· article· en· W4388417379 on OpenAlexafffund
Dinghai Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSemivarianceEconometricsRealized varianceVolatility (finance)EconomicsAutoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityDownside riskFinancial economicsComputer scienceStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we explore the realized semivariation measures using high-frequency intraday data within the framework of realized semivariance GARCH by taking an in-depth look. We derive general theoretical expressions for moment conditions of returns and realized semivariation measures, providing a convenient approach to investigate the statistical properties of realized semivariation dynamics. Notably, the introduction of threshold effects in the model reveals several intriguing empirical findings. One significant discovery is that during a substantial decline in returns, the negative realized semivariance exerts a more influential impact on future volatility compared to its positive counterpart. We further examine the forecasting performance under a realized semivariance heterogeneous autoregression environment. The results demonstrate that the inclusion of thresholds and the adoption of an optimal threshold level generally enhance the accuracy of volatility forecasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied EconomicsSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207